Only a few lines devoted to this story that did so much to talk about Italians ...; another significant but not unique: in fact there are dozens and dozens of other "cases Englaro" for which there has been lit all jumping
the preamble, the words of fact and explanation as they are just words redundant, and go directly to 'core' of the problem: the lack of regulations governing and regulating the behavior of citizens, doctors and judges, when faced with situations "vegetative state".
What laws adopted then?
could make thousands and thousands of discussions on: conferences and seminars between politicians and doctors, including doctors and doctors of church and state ... but it would be the usual 'Italian minestrone', just words that continue to leave Italians uncertainty and regulatory vacuum.
The simplest solution is in a law that already exists: one for organ donation, in fact, this legislation leaves ample freedom of the individual to make decisions in case of accident, proceed to the removal of organs for other people who need it, or forbid it.
How do the following: the individual has to decide whether in the case of "vegetative state" to live or die for death induced in the case of tacit consent, or if you do not express any choice between life or death, must necessarily Praval the preservation of life, as is the rule that doctors must safeguard the lives and health.
then death will no longer be induced (as for Eluana) a cruel death by starvation, thirst and physical exhaustion, and this is just a torture, and our state prohibits and condemns torture, torturers and principals of torture.
In "Englaro case" then, since there are no specific laws, paradoxically, the state itself should proceed to trial against the judges who issued the sentence against doctors and against the same father Eluana (which also had an attitude that anything human, releasing more and more controversial statements and policies that a good father ...).
0 comments:
Post a Comment